

Let’s Talk About Money
By: Inara | June 22nd, 2007
This post is about money.
But before I get carried away, a warning: what follows is an in depth look into the economic side of Olympique Lyonnais. As a scientist-to-be, I love numbers and percentages, and I’m curious about where Lyon’s money comes from (beside Roman Abramovich’s wallet). So if you have no interest in the business side of things, visit Perez until I post a less technical entry.
And now back to the money…
This blog entry that Bob posted yesterday got me thinking, what exactly is Lyon’s economic situation? Since it’s a French club, there aren’t debts or anything remotely disreputable in their financial dealings, and as long as the club stays out of scandal, I suppose most people don’t really care how Lyon make their money as long as they do.
But I was genuinely interested, so I did a bit of research.
For those of you unfamiliar with how Lyon’s finances work, let me give you a quick overview. The club, as well as other subsidiary divisions, is owned by OL Groupe, a holding company created by Aulas in order to spur the club’s economic development by bringing in additional sources of income. Aulas’s move to make Lyon into a business was quite controversial at the time because French clubs tend to be “family run” (which means low on profit but high on the feel-good factor).
And yes, Aulas is the founder, president, and main shareholder of OL Groupe.

Deloitte has been charting Lyon’s financial progress during the past several years.
GENERAL CLUB INFORMATION
Revenue (from 2007): €166.1m
Net income: €15.9m
Revenue Sources: 43.1% TV broadcasting; 23.1% transfers; 12.8% derived products; 12.7% ticketing; 8.4% sponsorships.
Lyon’s current value is estimated to be €312m. It’s a far cry from clubs such as Real Madrid and Bayern Munich, but three years ago, Lyon was worth approximately €145m. The margin of improvement is a rather big one (especially considering that some top clubs have actually dropped in value).
For comparison’s sake, Olympique de Marseille recently joined the list of the top twenty five most valuable clubs in the world for the first time in years. OM is worth about €117m.
OL’s revenue increased by nearly 80% since 2004. In the past year alone, Lyon jumped from being the fifteenth to the eleventh wealthiest club in the world, with a €40m increase in revenue and a 65% increase in value. While the gap between Lyon and tenth place Liverpool is still quite significant (€50m), should Lyon keep growing at their current rate, there is nothing to stop the club from entering the top ten in the next few years.
With ticket sales at their highest (an average L1 match day attendance is 38,500), and with a record number of season tickets being sold, Lyon have outgrown the Stade de Gerland and are planning to build a 60,000 seat stadium that will feature a retractable roof. In order to fund this project, Aulas lobbied the French government for the right to float football clubs on the stock market, a battle he eventually won last fall.

Lyon’s stock prices dropped during their barren period in February and March.
Last February, Lyon became the first publicly traded French football club, with shares priced at around €24. The initial offering was very successful (the shares were more than six times oversubscribed), and the club quickly amassed close to €100m, money which will be used to build their future stadium (to be completed by 2010). Aulas has already received interest from several companies wishing for the stadium to carry their name, but they would have to pay around €150m for naming rights, with Lyon paying for the remainder from their own funds.
Getting a new stadium built with the maximum of their own investment will ensure that Lyon won’t be saddled with large debts, and they will finally have the budget they need in order to compete with the richest clubs in Europe.
BROADCASTING
Despite being a hotbed of footballing talent, the TV rights in France, while substantial thanks to the current Canal+ deal (worth €600m), don’t compare to the Premiership’s billion dollar payouts.
By the end of this season, West Ham will have earned the same amount of money from broadcasting as Lyon (approximately €45m). Lille, Marseille, and other clubs will receive significantly less than that.
It also doesn’t help that foreign broadcasters aren’t interested in buying rights to L1, an inherently defensive league filled with some of the best goalkeepers and defenders in the world. Spectators don’t want to watch ninety minutes of defending - they want to see lots and lots of goals. Fans would rather watch a spectacular loss than a drab 0-0 tie.
But despite these handicaps, Lyon have the highest media profile of any Ligue 1 club. Last year, they were the most televised French team with an average audience of 3.3 million people per game, and of the top ten French audiences generated by football games, those involving Lyon attracted the eight highest audiences.
Lyon also get money from UEFA broadcasting rights. In 2005-2006, Lyon raked in an extra €25.3m from Champions League participation, receiving the third highest amount of money behind Barcelona and Arsenal, the two finalists (not sure why since Lyon went out in the quarterfinals…).
SPONSORSHIP
Two years ago, Lyon signed a four year deal worth approximately €12m per season with Renault Trucks - a record for French football and comparable with some of the largest deals in Europe. This past summer, Lyon also signed a deal with Accor Group for €9m per year for the next three years.
Umbro provide another €7.6m per season. Aulas has flirted with going to a different kit maker - both Nike and Adidas have offered - but Lyon are pleased to be associated with Umbro and recently extended their contract until 2013, in a deal worth €45m.
In the next few years, Lyon will be limiting the number of partnerships and will allow only one shirt sponsor (Novotel) for better merchandising.
PLAYER TRADING
This is a significant source of income for Lyon, especially compared to other clubs. According to OL Groupe:
The Club’s sporting policy is based on gradually putting together an increasingly successful squad of players, anticipating requirements and avoiding any hasty, disruptive and uncontrolled change. It has sold four or five players per year in the last five years, and players are recruited on the basis of squad requirements.
That basically means purchasing inexpensive talent and then selling them off for higher prices a few years later. Last summer, Lyon earned €47.4m in player sales (Diarra, Nilmar, Monsoreau, Pedretti, Clément, Frau). The outgoing players were replaced by fewer but more talented footballers (Kallstrom, Squillaci, Toulalan, and Alou Diarra) for €31m.
Additionally, the club’s goal is to increase the quality of their players while still maintaining their successful trade policy. Their plan has been working so far because Lyon is classified twelfth in terms of the marketable value of their players, with a manpower estimated to be worth €172.6m. It’s important that this number continue to increase because higher profile players make the club more valuable to potential investors.

Despite being 12th in Europe, OL players are twice as valuable as their French counterparts.
HANDICAPS
Wages: Taxes in France are atrociously high. Any player who comes to play in L1 will see half their salary disappear, which means French clubs have to spend more money on wages (Lyon’s wage bill eats up a higher percentage of their budget than in clubs such as Manchester United and Real Madrid). For example, to pay a player 100, a club in England will have to pay 115, in Spain 130, in Italy 150, and in France 200. So smaller clubs such as Lille, Nantes, and Nice can’t afford to keep their talented players for more than two or three years because other clubs tempt them away.
Lyon have more of a chance as they inevitably attract the best French talent. Not only are they the domestic superpower and a growing name in Europe, but just as important, they pay the highest salaries in L1, with twelve of their players among the twenty most well-paid footballers in France. It also helps that Aulas is notoriously difficult to deal with when it comes to selling his players.
However, Lyon have a hard time attracting players from foreign leagues because they can’t match salaries paid even by clubs such as Atletico Madrid. Despite all their economic growth, Lyon still can’t foot David Trezeguet’s wage bill, or even Alberto Gilardino’s.
Club Debt: The Direction Nationale de Control de Gestion (DNCG) is the LFP’s watchdog group which monitors the fiscal responsibilities of the clubs. Unlike in England, Spain, Italy, Portugal, etc, French clubs are strictly regulated financially, with all transactions undergoing scrutiny to make sure they aren’t going into debt by financing big money buys they can’t afford. Nor are the clubs allowed to end the season with a deficit (or they face relegation and other sanctions). So they can’t embark on huge spending sprees with debts to be paid for later by rich owners. While this does make French clubs financially stable (no Glazers, Abramoviches, or any other billionaires in sight), it also means that the clubs can’t take risks either.
FUTURE PROSPECTS
Can Lyon overcome the financial limitations imposed upon them by France? Not anytime soon, no. In fact, as long as the DNCG exists, OL will never be on equal financial footing with clubs in the Big 3 leagues no matter how much money they earn (damn taxes). And until the rest of L1 catches up in terms of money and development, French football will continue to be lopsided.
However, the DNCG isn’t a bad thing. And I’m convinced that if French football should overtake the bigger leagues, it will because those leagues - which lack the necessary safeguards - could collapse financially (like what happened to Leeds United). Debts accumulate over time, and not even having a billionaire owner can pay them off. At least Lyon never have to worry about being in the red.
…..Anyone still awake? If you are, thanks for bearing with me as I explored the really boring topic of Lyon’s finances. I promise, something more interesting next time, like a picture of Fred’s wife or something.
Sources:
Deloitte Football Money League, 2006 and 2007
Forbes, “The Most Valuable Soccer Teams, 2007”
International Herald Tribune, “Lyon Plans to Move Into 60,000-seater Stadium”
Manchester Evening News, “Umbro Get Lyon’s Share”
OL Groupe, Prospectus
Reuters, “Olympique Lyon Boosted By Successful Share Float”
UEFA, Financial Report for 2005-2006
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Very great and interesting posting. Thank U, Inara.
Posted from
France

-



Sujet très intéréssant

Very interessant subject
I just would to say Finance in France aren’t easy : very important taxes ! So the footballs players in France are less euh…rich than in other countries (England…) That’s for this too !Voila vive mon super Anglais..
Allez Lyon
Posted from
United States

-



Your posts are always impressive, clever and very well informed. Im french, living in France, and despite the langage handicap, i enjoy reading the posts on these blogs. The quality of your work let me dumb. Thanks very much. Taxes beyond me explain the recurrent plundering, and the fact despite his rang Lyon and ligue 1 is less attractive than a spanish middle board team. but without Taxes should France ever be France?
Posted from
France

-



That was really interesting for it’s not a common topic. And at least we got to learn some real things, it’s not rumours like the possible arrival of Kaka or Drogba. But it also shows something else : that football equals money.
Posted from
United States

-



How does one purchase a club if they can’t go into debt?
Posted from
United States

-



Great post! I love numbers as well.:-)
I also recently read about the high income taxes in France. Especially Spain and the Netherlands have some laws that allow clubs to pay way less taxes for their player salaries.
I can give you the answer to why Lyon received so much Champions League TV rights money despite only reaching the 1/4 finals. The UEFA markets the TV rights centrally but pays the clubs according to the amount of money that they earn from the respective European countries. E.g. the Netherlands have a very small TV market thus Ajax Amsterdam earns only half the money that Bayern Munich earns for reaching the 1/8 finals. England again is king here, France and Germany come in second…
A bit sad. The dutch league with clubs like Ajax have a great European tradition. While the French and German league might already be bitching that they trail behind in the money game, it’s even worse for Dutch or say Portugese clubs. While France and Germany theoretically have markets that are big enough to let them compete with the big three, smaller countries will never even have that chance.
Posted from
Germany

-



Good stuff Inara. The taxes issue is a big one, because Lyon will always have a tough time competiting for big players if they can not afford there salaries. If the socialist French government would lower taxes then maybe something could be done. I dont have nearly as bad a problem in New York, althogh losing 20% of your pay check as a 20 year old hurts in the end.
Posted from
United States

-



I’m amazed at the depth of your knowledge and the ability of one with a post-Tiago-tequilan hangover to explain it so well.

Posted from
United States

-



Do you know what the ownership structure of most other French teams is? And do you know what percentage of OL stock Aulas owns? Just curious.
I have an MBA in finance and accounting, so this stuff fascinates me. Thanks for putting it into a concise and comprehensible package. Me personally? I think The Offside bloggers can — completely on our own — increase the desire for French football watching among the rest of the world. So get ready, OL. We’ll bring you those TV rights Euros. I promise.
Total world domination. It’s always been Bob’s goal.
Posted from
United States

-



Wow.That was such an interesting and informative post.I really like how you explained the financial matters easy enough for people to understand, and you did it without leaving out the crucial details.
Posted from
United States

-



French government is not socialist, Corey

It’s a liberalist one. But that even was the case before the presidential election… Wait & see, but I don’t think that making lower taxes for football players will be a priority here… !Posted from
France

-



Jo: I too can’t ever imagine France lowering their taxes for sports players, as much as I’d like them too for Lyon’s sake. But it does against the ideals of the country.
Anyway, France isn’t football crazy like the rest of Europe. With tennis, rugby, and cycling taking up a big portion of the sports market, football is in many ways still growing in popularity. Other than in Marseille, which is a footballing town more than any other in France (also weird, that Paris has only one professional football club). France is kind of like the US in this respect.
Djag: Haha, true. In all the griping we do about poorer salaries in France, footballers are still pretty rich. I remember an interview Belhadj gave a few months ago, when he was still with Sedan - his car is the latest Mercedes on the market, and he has another one too. French footballers definitely aren’t paupers if they are in L1.
Thierry: As much as I gripe about taxes, you’re right, France wouldn’t be France without its taxation. You can’t really argue against a system that takes from the rich and gives to the poor, so to speak.
Thomas: I got tired of posting rumors and thought it was time to do a more substantial post. And footbusiness seemed like a good place to start!
Brian: Buying a large stake in a French football club is really having maybe 10 or 15 percent of the shares. No one person truly owns a huge part of a club. Even Aulas and Dreyfuss, the majority shareholders of Lyon and OM, own only a third of the total shares of their clubs, the remainder owned by smaller groups.
So for the most part, French football clubs tend to stay “family run,” that is, owned by the same group of people for a long time, who appoint presidents and managers as needed.
However, this past year, Robert Louis Dreyfuss did put up his Marseille shares for sale, and there was a guy interested. But then the DNCG got involved, and it turned out that buyer didn’t have all the money available, blah blah. So while the cost of buying a French club is cheaper, it’s more difficult because of all the oversight (the Glazer takeover could never have happened in France).
Jan: I can believe that the Netherlands have a smaller TV audience, but I would think Portugal would have a larger football audience. In any case, without broadcasting, France and Germany would be even further behind, so I’m grateful. In Lyon’s case, CL money is an important addition to the club’s budget.
Corey: I think at this point, it’s useless to hope to compete with the big clubs financially. All Lyon can do is do well in Europe and increasing their income. Hopefully one day, a player won’t mind earning slightly less at Lyon. Let’s hope.
Laurie: Tequila strangely clarifies my thoughts.
I described club ownership in my response to Brian, above. Aulas owns (I think, I have to check) a 32 percent share in OL Groupe. Pathe (owned by Jerome Seydoux, the brother of Lille’s president), is the second majority shareholder, who owns 31 percent. Another 20 percent is owned by smaller companies, and the remaining shares were the ones recently sold on the stock market to be owned by individuals.
And I agree, I think the Offside is a great way to make people interested in a club. If I was able to convince just one person to sit down and watch a Lyon game, all the long hours of blogging will have finally paid off.
PS. It’s awesome that you have a double degree in finance and in French football, both of which probably come in more handy than what I’ll get my degree in (virology, of all things).
Julien: I’m glad you enjoyed it. I know I always gripe about Lyon’s finances, so I thought maybe I should post some information about it. It was also easier writing this because I remember reading a lot of this stuff last February, when Lyon first floated.
Posted from
United States

-



Great Article!
To complete your links, a report from the French Senate (in french but there is maybe a translation) about the impact of taxation on the french soccer clubs compared to their european concurrents:
http://www.senat.fr/rap/r03-336/r03-33652.html
The problem is not so much on the income tax (except compare to UK, even if this report doesn’t take in account the last reforms), but on the social withdrawals… and it seems pretty hard and unfair to give a special social and medical status for the soccer players (and probably by extension to every sportsman…Posted from
United States

-



very important proviso from matt about the total cost of a player consists largely of payroll contributions other than taxes.
i’d like to add that the OVERALL situation in france is not so different from other european countries, but these make a special case for athletes (which doesn’t stop most F1 drivers or ATP players from electing domicile in monaco!) which, in light of how much money footballers make, seems obscene to me. all in all, and especially as concerns the DNCG, i think football would be better off if everyone did things the french way! après nous, le déluge de pognon!
Posted from
France

-



Laurie | June 22nd, 2007: “Do you know what the ownership structure of most other French teams is?”
i’m making a second post to treat this subject separately.
sports clubs, including the ones our kids play in, are almost entirely “associations loi 1901″… non-profit organizations. for that matter, so are local gardening clubs or sewing circles! until 1975 this was the only organization possible for sports clubs, and today about a third of L1 clubs still hold this status.
nowadays, if payroll is over 5M€ or turnstile receipts over 7.5M€, clubs must create a commercial corporation… either an an SAOS (société anonyme à objet sportif) or an SASP (société anonyme sportive professionnelle). the difference between these? an SAOS may not distribute dividends or pay its officers, and the majority of the shares must be held by the association 1901. an SASP does not have the same constraints, and as such may be a profitmaking entity, but it still must conform to specific regulations; they may not hold shares in another sports society (to avoid conflict of sporting interest) and must have their accounts overseen by the DNCG. note that none of this is in the objective of hampering topflight football clubs, but for assuring honest sports competition in general, and in light of scandals elsewhere (officials on italy, “suitcases” in spain…) it’s far from a bad thing in itself!
Posted from
France

-



That’s interesting and good to learn. The counterpart to associations loi 1901 in Germany is a GV (gemeinnütziger verein), but all sports clubs are EVs (eingetragener verein) which the dictionary tells me would be a membership corporation. Some big football clubs like Schalke, Hamburg and Stuttgart are all EVs while a lot of other clubs decided to split the club into two during the 90s. The core club remains an EV while the mens football team is turned into an AG (aktiegesellschaft), a stock corporation or simply a corporation. This gives some more freedom for business decisions. Yet there is the 50percent plus 1 rule that says that 51% of the corporation has to be held by the EV. That means you can’t takeover and own a Bundesliga club, and you can’t hold more than 49% of the stock in the mens football team if the club decided to outsource it, thus you can’t take over that part of the club either. That’s the reason why there aren’t any Abramovichs, Berlusconis etc. in German football.
And those rules as guignol pointed out weren’t made to hamper the clubs. Yet with the recent wave of EPL takeovers, the gap that has already been there through more lucrative TV deals has widened even more by the money of those investors.
Although I’m still unsure about one thing: a French football club could potentially be taken over completely by an investor, right? But it hasn’t happened yet because there are rich families who hold stocks in the clubs and won’t give those away?
Posted from
Germany

-



Thanks so much for the info, Guignol, Jan! I know I gripe about about France’s regulations, but the outcome is much cleaner football! It goes to show that the only scandal people still talk about is Tapie’s match fixing, which was over 14 years ago!
Jan brings up a good question about takeovers. My understanding what that a rich person could buy out a person’s stakes in a club but that it doesn’t really happen. It almost happened to Marseille but then financial irregularities in the buyer were discovered, nothing came of it. Plus, I can’t see any billionaires interested in an L1 club since the whole point of such purchases is to make profits, and there are hardly every profits in France.
Posted from
United States

-



One of the reasons that Monaco is the club most able to attract stars (Morientes, Saviola, if you can call him that) is because they have a lot of tax benefits. I wish Lyon could move to Monaco for that.
Posted from
United States

-



[...] 5 - Big European clubs attract “stars.” There’s no point in denying that Lyon can’t attract big players. But there are good reasons for this. First of all, the wage problem. Though Lyon pay the highest wages in France, they can’t compete with Spanish, Italian, and English clubs because of high French taxes (read more on that here). [...]
Posted from
United States

-



[...] it is - and where it will be in the next few years (read a more thorough overview on club finances here). There are no rich investors to aid Lyon in their quest for global domination. Every penny the [...]
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed
















