

The Perrin Chronicles: Part I
By: Inara | September 21st, 2007
Alain Perrin has got to be wondering what just hit him on the head.
Here he is, in what is supposedly the easiest coaching job not just in France but quite possibly in Europe. After all, managing Lyon doesn’t require that much effort. He’s guaranteed to have the best team in Ligue 1, and he has a president and a sporting director that do all the hard work for him.
Easy peesy, right?
I know I’m reporting this rather late, as news of Juninho’s most recent tantrum is all over French news (sometimes I do have to do work unrelated to my blog), but Massaer from the Marseille Offside was kind enough to email me some troubling links about the latest drama at the Stade de Gerland.
Apparently, Juninho was quite pissed at Perrin’s tactics for the Barca match (tactics which even confounded Eric Abidal, who never saw Lyon play like that).
I don’t speak about the tactics, ask the coach…I’m disappointed because we didn’t take enough risks. We are accustomed to playing in a more open way anywhere and against anyone. And in a more courageous way.”
Subtlety criticizing his coach on TV wasn’t enough. Today, he walked out of a video review session of that oh-so-awful game because he was angry at the criticisms of his performance. Perrin, besieged as he is on all fronts, hurried to play down the incident by saying that it’s the newspapers who are blowing it all out of proportion.
According to Perrin,
Juninho’s remarks in Barcelona were disappointing. He didn’t understand [the tactics] because he was in the middle of the match…This is not an incident for us. Juninho doesn’t like to review video performances after matches, but his attitude isn’t annoying, or I would not have spoken to you about this. Some players remained for the meeting but perhaps didn’t pay attention or perhaps even slept.
When questioned on whether he would be punishing Juninho (after all, it is terribly rude to leave when your coach is talking to you, especially when you are the captain), Perrin was surprisingly firm about not applying any sanctions.
Absolutely not. He will be present on Sunday and with the captain’s armband…if he wishes to keep it. His action didn’t affect the operation of the team. He didn’t openly criticize the meeting nor did he prevent others from attending. It was an isolated gesture which relates only to him. There is no effect on the atmosphere of the group.
I’m disappointed in Juni because this is really not the time to be publicly showing dissent. In times like this, the team needs to show a united front. After all, what do Lyon possess if not their unity and team spirit? Displays like Juninho’s are not setting a good example to a squad that needs stability and reassurance more than anything else.

Even with a very impressive CV, Gerard Houllier found Lyon too difficult to deal with.
Still, despite repeated reassurances from Perrin, I get the feeling that eventually, the cauldron that has been boiling in the locker rooms at the Gerland will not just boil over but explode. There is a lot of anger and blame being cast around among the management and the players. I’m not sure about what or regarding who, but it’s clear that Aulas needs to hire a really good counselor for the club.
I’m not blaming Perrin for this, and I think it’s too early to say whether he’ll be a good coach for Lyon or not. As others have said, experience is not necessarily a prerequisite. But what I do doubt are Perrin’s man-management capabilities. Can he manage a squad with such willful players, and more importantly, can he deal with Aulas and Bernard Lacombe constantly looking over his shoulders? There is a line between bowing to authority and establishing one’s own, and I have to wonder if Perrin has learned yet where he should toe that particular line.
It’s no secret that locker room jokers have nicknamed Perrin “passe pas l’hiver” or “won’t get through the winter.” Perrin has already clashed with Lacombe and Aulas over transfer policy, and his dedication to the 4-4-2 has annoyed players who are more comfortable in the 4-3-3 (read: Juninho).

Was Perrin a lamb to the slaughter or a willing victim of the Aulas system?
Naturally, a coach has a right to complain if his club is ignoring his transfer demands, and he is well within his authority for wanting to try out a different formation. But it seems Perrin is doomed to have a harder time than others. He will never be able to mold his team, only the team that appears in Aulas’s long term visions. He has to accept having the club’s sporting director above him in club hierarchy. He will be expected to do better than his predecessors despite having his hands tied behind his back.
And even if he lasts the entire season and wins Lyon another title, it still might not be enough.
Now we know why they call him “Reggie.”
On a side note, please welcome the newest L1 blog to the Offside: RC Lens!
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



interesting post inara. but i think perrin despite not having a real power in the recrutment area can do what he wants with the team during games.
I did follow the juninho’s story and his criticisms. And I was very pleased the way Perrin dealt with it. He didn’t go to the clash. Even said that Juninho wasn’t an isolated case in the locker room.
I think Perrin is cool with the players, and I like that. I think he just doesn’t discuss enough with the players.
I actualy believe that his comments about the players during the video review was great. And I think the players will like him for it.
As a teacher, on behaviour management (kids also have big egos sometimes), you learn that you must never go to the clash with “big egos”. Perrin is using all the right tricks to smoothen things.
Posted from
Japan

-



Perrin never hesitated to go to clash in previous clubs.
I don’t like this bit of news for Lyon because if Perrin didn’t go to clash, as he used to do before, it’s because he already fears being fired.
He fears a clash with Juni won’t necessarily end up with him as the winner. And THAT is NOT good news for Lyon fans. Players should NEVER take over.That said, Perrin missed his Barca game completely and was the main reason for the 3-0 defeat. His post-game comments downplaying Barca’s domination were completely off-base and ridiculous. Anyone that saw the game knows it could have ended up 5-0. He should have accepted part of the blame, and he didn’t.
I think Perrin is not at ease in Lyon and fears a firing any week.
Posted from
United States

-



why would anyone want to fire perrin?
9 official games: 1 “trophee des champions”, 5 wins 2 loses in L1, 1 lost game AWAY in BARCA.Perrin’s attitude to Juninho is great. Juninho was upset of the loss, he said things out of temper (we all did after the loss). You don’t punish someone who already had a bad enough time.
I think (hope) this incident will get Juninho to like Perrin more.On the other hand Evilo, I do agree that Perrin should have said he messed up completely in the game against Barca. But leave him time to make himself forgive against Glasgow (and L1 games before that).
Posted from
Japan

-



Perrin took over in May, Lyon having just won the League. He wasn’t able to keep Abidal, Malouda, Wiltord, Tiago, Diarra and Caçapa at the club, but overlooked Keita, Bodmer, Grosso and Anderson’s arrivals (Belhadj was bought in January 2007).
However, Keita has been a dissapointement (doesn’t he fit in Perrin’s playing style? is he out of form?), and whilst he hasn’t been helped by Lyon’s injury crisis, he hasn’t yet been able to set up a convincing Lyon side, except against Metz.
Benzema’s 8 goals hide the fact that only 6 players have scored (Baros 2, Juni, Ben Arfa, Govou, Bodmer 1), whilst last season’s OL had already 8 goalscorers (Benzema 2, Scquillaci 1, Fred 5, Malouda 4, Wiltord 1, Tiago 2, Cris 1, Juni 1). And before I get “but OL had to defend more this season”, they only conceded one more goal with Vercoutre in goal and Cris injured…
Perrin won’t be sacked, at least before the winter break. No sense in doing so. But I’m sure that Aulas is breathing down his neck and asking him why his 18M€ investment on Keita isn’t looking like a wise move yet, why he buys a defender (Anderson) that Perrin leaves on the bench behind a midfielder who was completely out of his league in defence against Messi&Co.
Perrin is also taking the back-lash of the frustrations under the Houllier era. He didn’t start Juninho against Auxerre, and hasn’t left him out since. Sure Juninho is a very important team member, but since he doesn’t perform at his best in a 4-4-2 formation, why doesn’t Perrin switch between 4-3-3 with Juninho and 4-4-2 without? I think it’s because he’s pressured by Aulas to keep Juninho in the side, since Juninho and Lyon are synonymous to many people who follow Lyon… For this reason, Perrin can’t play in his style (not one that Aulas would like anyway), and is doomed to a “average” season with Lyon : only a Ligue 1 title.
Posted from
France

-



Shazback: I agree with you when you say players are still frustrated of the Houiller period. Perrin offers a better football than Houiller to me. The players are just not used to change anymore.
However, I don’t see what Perrin did wrong when he used Bodmer rather than Anderson in Barca. Anderson had not played in 3 months, he would never have been able to keep up with the likes of Messi. If you want to complain about using Bodmer as a CD then ask why Perrin didn’t use Paillot instead.
As for Keita not playing, it is maybe a good thing. In my opinion, Keita had too much pressure on him. Starting on the bench made him feel like another player. BUT, I would agree that he should have played against Barca. Big games are for him if you look at what he did with Lille.You give too much credit to Aulas. He holds the wallet, but I doubt he is involved in the player’s selection. That’ll be more Lacombe.
Posted from
Japan

-



I think Perrin is worried that he might become Paul Le Guen at Rangers – backed into a hole with a president that will back the captain over the manager. It’s silly because to my knowledge, Aulas always backs the manager first (even if he secretly doesn’t).
Perrin is scared, and that’s troubling. Fine, let Juni off the hook now, but if he keeps up with his tantrums, Perrin has to make a stand before it does become Rangers-esque.
I don’t think Perrin is a bad manager, but I wish he’d just said, “Yeah, I messed up, let’s move on” as opposed to “we tried to attack and had a great chance until the very end.” That might have taken some of the heat off of him, ironically. Contrary to a lot of people, I don’t think this is the right time to bring in a big manager because Lyon isn’t ready for someone of the caliber of Lippi, Mourinho, etc. Not only can we not attract them, but we can’t provide the resources they’ll want just yet. But I do think that this is one of Aulas’s long term goals along with the stadium.
As for Deschamps, the matter isn’t as clear-cut as it seems. Lyon were interested in him, but he quit Juventus a week after Houllier stepped down, and in that time Aulas talked to a lot of other candidates, including Perrin. Deschamps wasn’t able to talk to Lyon while still under contract with Juve, and when Aulas did call him, according to DD, he had to have an answer by the end of the day since Lyon had to appoint a coach by Monday. DD couldn’t make a decision that fast, whereas Perrin decided three months ago he’d like to be coach of Lyon.
Though who knows, Deschamps may have struggled at Lyon too.
Posted from
United States

-



There’s no sense in firing Perrin. Lyon will win the title even if they keep playing like this. If their CL run is not as good as the other years, they’ll arrive in January without main competitions.
Didier Deschamps won’t come to Lyon like he won’t come to Marseille. Both Bernard Lacombe and Jose Anigo are way too involved in Football matters for him to feel comfortable. And now with the Chelsea job open, and as an ex-chelsea player himself, Deschamps seems a suitable candidate.Posted from
France

-



Another excellent post indeed. Thanks for sharing the love with the Lens blog. I only hope to have a blog half as good as yours and the rest of the offside bloggers.
Posted from
United States

-



I can’t remember the last time Aulas fired a manager. Anyway, Perrin shouldn’t be worried about that unless he can’t qualify for the CL and misses out on the UEFA Cup (you know, to keep Bayern company). You make a good point about DD not liking interference, as I remember he had the same problem at Juventus and at Monaco. It’s one of the reasons Claude Puel didn’t want to come to Lyon – he wanted to be able to do his own thing, which is not possible at Lyon or Marseille because it’s a “team” project. Though no offense, but Lacombe > Anigo eight days a week.
Posted from
United States

-



In honesty I’m happy to see how Perrin does and give him time in the job, but I was baffled at why he was appointed by Aulas? As I live in England I had followed his spell at Portsmouth and they were doing really dreadfully, and he seemingly had no tactical capabilities or control over the players. His record as a manager is quite unimpressive as well, and for a team looking to go far in the champions league surely they should have gone for a much more experienced and successful manager in the first place.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



I think Perrin’s relationship with the players is a bit rocky. There is a considerable amount of annoyance from the group over his coaching methods.
First of all, he’s very OCD about getting his message across, so much so that he’ll interrupt practices several times just to say one little thing. He also makes the players come in extra early on game day for light training, and doesn’t hand out that automatic day off after games that Houllier used to do.
He’s making the players work harder, so naturally they are a little sulky. In this case I support Perrin, because being super fit is a great advantage. But he has to do it in a way that makes his plays agree, not just annoy them.
Posted from
United States

-



who knows exactly what went on? not me. but my guess is that at least 75% of what got juni to leave the video session was just anger at getting beat like that. and whether i’m a fan or AP i’ve got to think that’s a good thing.
did AP screw up? if he’s responsible for OL standing around watching barça play, yes. does juni have a right to be angry about that? yes. are both of them going to learn from this and get on with business? yes.
Posted from
France

-



inara, i don’t think AP is runs things much differently now. what practices have followed matches only concerned those who didn’t play, and the last two weeks there have been none at all.
as far as showing up early on matchday, OL used to “show up” the day before and stay in a hotel together, even for home games… a practice perrin doesn’t see as necessary but has recently accepted as a “tradition”…
it seems AP is starting to realize he didn’t need to fix things that weren’t broken, and is overcoming the “second wife syndrome”.
Posted from
France

-



Juni said as much on OLTV about being unable to watch the match. I’m sure that it was nothing malicious towards Perrin besides the usual upset emotional Brazilian response.
But I have to wonder if what Govou said about there being one rule for Juni and one for everyone else will come back to haunt Perrin. Yeah, Juni walked out, but if Ben Arfa had done so, do you think Perrin would have been so cool about it?
This is the guy who got angry at Bodmer for not concentrating on his corner kicks at practice and sent him home early and didn’t play him the next game.
As for his pre-game practices, I’m just relying on what I’ve learned from ESPN (shady, I know), so it’s good that Perrin is adjusting.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












